I serve a small church, average worship around 84 a Sunday, nearing 100 on a good Sunday. We are not tiny, but we aren't what I would consider a medium sized church either. We are small. There are some great benefits to being a small congregation. Everyone knows everyone, which can be a downside too. There is a level of community and camaraderie that runs deep and has for generations. When welcomed into the fold it can feel like comfort food.
If we are using the early church as a model, should staying small always be our goal? Should our goal be to grow into a mega church and convert thousands of people?
I'm stuck and I'm torn. I love comfort food. I love my small church. But too much comfort food is bad for you and leads to bad habits and health problems. You can only have too much fried chicken before your arteries clog up and you die. You can only hold on to the church your great-great-grandfather built for so long. If you don't loosen your grip you will choke its source and die. The essence of being church is to be growing, but by how much?
This is not a new question but is one that has been bopping in my head. Should all churches seek to create converts like the early church? Should being a mega-church who then produce other congregations every every congregation's goal? If we are not growing are we being Church?
Would love to know your thoughts and feelings on the subject.